The Theory Of Sociological Imagination - 870 Words

For decades, there have been many questions that sociologists generally ask themselves when examining a social phenomenon. One well known sociologist is C. Wright Mills. Mills came up with the concept of sociological imagination. It is used to describe the ability of individuals to think away from routines that they are used to in everyday life and look at them from an entirely new perspective. Using this concept, mills applied it to asking and answering imaginative thoughts of sociological questions. Mills came up with three questions that many thinkers have consistently asked in their investigations of humanity and society. The three questions are what is the structure of this particular society as a whole? , where does this society stand in human history? , and what varieties of men and women now prevail in this society and in this period?. Moreover, one social phenomenon that can explain how these questions help focus one’s social imagination is crime. C. Wright Mills firs t question is what is the structure of this particular society as a whole?. In asking this question, Mills wanted to know how crime is understood in society and how is it an essential components that is inter-related in society?. In society, crime is seen as any actions that violates the laws established by a political authority. However, according to the authors of the book introduction to sociology states that â€Å"sociologists studying crime and deviance in the interactionist tradition focus on devianceShow MoreRelatedThe Theories Of The Sociological Imagination976 Words   |  4 Pagesthem. So, you may ask how the individual above can make sense of the complex world around them. The answer is simple by looking at the world like any great social analysts would. They do this through C. Wright Mills sociological imagination. To understand the Sociological imagination we first need to understand what the term means. It is the process of the mind which allows us to understand the relationship between our individual lives (personal experience) and the larger social forces (public issues)Read MoreCommon Sense Explanations And The Explanations Of C. Wright Mills Theory Of The Sociological Imagination1534 Words   |  7 PagesIn this essay I will be exploring the differences between common sense explanations and the explanations of C. Wright Mills theory of The Sociological Imagination. Common sense is based on people s personal experiences and their opinions, very often constructed from social norms and generalised views. Whereas, the Sociological Imagination thought up by sociologist C. Wright Mills (1959) is based on the ideas of thinking critically and skeptically, in order to think sociologically. He wrote thatRead MoreEssay on The Sociological Imagination1389 Words   |  6 PagesMy personal condensed definition of â€Å"the sociological imagination† is that it is the idea one should be aware of the societal structures around themselves, and how those structures can influence a person and vice-versa. In addition, I think that having a â€Å"sociological imagination† also involves a deep appreciation for the importance of society and culture. Consequently, for a person that has completed a basic introduction to sociology college course and actually paid attention, I would hope thatRead MoreEssay about Sociology Midterm955 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿1. Define the sociological perspective or imagination, cite its components, and explain how they were defended by C. Wright Mills. The sociological imagination is defined as being a way of thinking that helps us use information or data to form theories about the social patterns around us. We collect information and from that information we may make judgments or prediction. However we cannot view society in one’s own point of view. Everyone is different so it is important to not only form our ownRead MoreAnalysis Of Dalton Conley s You May Ask Yourself 1267 Words   |  6 PagesDalton Conley’s book, You May Ask Yourself, defines sociological imagination as, â€Å"The ability to connect the most basic, intimate aspects of an individual’s life to seemingly impersonal and remote historical forces† (Conley 2015, pg. A-11). Sociological Imagination is the idea of being able to step outside of the box, and evaluate society from an alternative point of view. Symbolic Interactionism, norms, socialization, and the idea of understanding yourself vs. understanding the social aspect ofRead MoreS ociological Imagination s Critical Review1319 Words   |  6 PagesThe Sociological Imagination Critical Review Essay â€Å"The sociological imagination enables us to grasp history and biography and the relations between the two within society. This is its task and its promise.† C. Wright Mills writes about the sociological imagination in an attempt to have society become aware of the relationship between one’s personal experience in comparison to the wider society. By employing the sociological imagination into the real world, individuals are forced to perceiveRead MoreThe Sociological Imagination By C. Wright Mills1315 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"The sociological imagination enables us to grasp history and biography and the relations between the two within society. This is its task and its promise.† C. Wright Mills writes about the sociological imagination in an attempt to have society become aware of the relationship between one’s personal experience in comparison to the wider society. By employing the sociological imagination into the real world, individuals ar e forced to perceive, from a neutral position, social structures that, inRead MoreAnalysis of the sociological imagination and its use in sociology.1483 Words   |  6 PagesSociological Imagnation The sociological imagination is the ability to look at the everyday world and understand how it operates in order to make sense of their lives. It is a state of mind, which enables us to think critically about and understand the society in which we live, and our place in that world as individuals and as a whole. C. Wright Mills, first wrote of the concept in 1959. His understanding of it being that it was a quest for sociological understanding involving a form of consciousnessRead MoreSociology Imagination833 Words   |  4 Pagesdefined sociological imagination as the vivid awareness of the relationship between experience and the wider society. The sociological imagination is the capacity to shift from one perspective to another: from the political to the psychological; from examination of a single family to comparative assessment of the national budgets of the world; from the theological school to the military establishment; from considerations of an oil industry to studies of contemporary poetry.[1] Sociological Imagination:Read MoreSociological Imagination, Social Construction Of Reality And Socialization902 Words   |  4 PagesThe foundational concepts of sociological imagination, social construction of reality and socialization help us learn more about ourselves and the world. Sociological imagination is the way in which individuals realize the connection between their own experience of reality and the experiences of society as a whole. This realization allows people to make sense of the world around them. When one applies sociological imagination, they are stripping their own personal experiences from their thoughts

Similarities Between Machiavelli And Socrates - 1544 Words

Machiavelli and Socrates agree on very little. While an initial reading of the two may elicit some comparisons, the goals of their respective philosophies rely on different foundations, and would therefore culminate in very different political results for society. Socrates would likely see in the Prince a selfish ruler, while Machiavelli would see in Socrates a dangerous idealist whose ideas would lead to instability and the death of the state in which these ideas were implemented. Machiavelli’s philosophy of the Prince would not satisfy Socrates because instead of focusing on right action, the Prince is encouraged to put political expediency and self-preservation above all else. In addition, the type of political system that Machiavelli’s†¦show more content†¦The concept of fear as a tool and as a condition is present throughout the Prince. In what is likely his most famous quote, Machiavelli argues that â€Å"†¦it is much safer to be feared than lovedâ € ¦Ã¢â‚¬  (1950, p. 61). This implies that inspiring fear in one’s subjects is of great importance to the Prince, and that once again the means of doing this are secondary to the end goals. He also argues that the Prince himself should have a healthy amount of fear, both of his subjects and external threats, and that this fear will allow the Prince to preserve himself and therefore the state which he presides over (p. 67). Socrates would disagree with this fundamentally, for him it is not true that â€Å"†¦where there is fear there is also reverence†¦Ã¢â‚¬ , he would argue that in fact fear and reverence stand in sharp contrast to one another (Plato, 1987, p. 35). Using fear as a tool would not enable one to reach the ideal that Socrates espouses. He also addresses fear as a condition of a ruler by saying that a man should not consider life and death when making decisions, but again should only look to whether his actions are good and just. For him â€Å"†¦to be afraid of death is only another form of thinking that one is wise when one is not†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (pp. 59-60). Both Machiavelli and Socrates see fear as a part of human nature, but where Machiavelli sees fear as a weapon, Socrates sees weakness. A Prince that lived in a state of fear, while also using fear in order to gain andShow MoreRelatedSimilarities Between Socrates And Machiavelli1197 Words   |  5 Pages Socrates and Machiavelli both grew up in times of political instability which formed and shaped their political beliefs. Machiavelli primarily discussed his view of how a leader should behave in the book: The Prince. A prince is an individual who is the leader of a state or group of people. Machiavelli’s version of a prince is very accurate but, Socrates would not support Machiavelli’s version of a prince. Machiavelli believed a prince must be domineering and aggressive, while Socrates viewedRead MoreSimilarities Between Socrates And Machiavelli1905 Words   |  8 PagesEssay 1 While Socrates and Machiavelli lived over 1900 years apart, the dilemmas their societies faced draw many parallels. In Machiavelli’s â€Å"The Prince†, he demonstrates a wide-ranging set of rules and principles to be followed by a leader to ensure the steady maintenance of authority and stability in a state or principality. Not only would Socrates be opposed to many of the espoused views in â€Å"The Prince† on what creates a successful ruler, thereby society, but had he lived in Machiavelli’s â€Å"ideal†Read MoreSimilarities Between Socrates And Machiavelli1084 Words   |  5 Pagesamong them were Socrates and Machiavelli, whose ideas regarding violence and its ideal usage to us inspired countless other prominent figures after their respective times. Socrates believed humans are imperfect and fallible, and should therefore avoid using violence. Machiavelli on the on the other hand considered violence a useful tool in achieving one’s goals . Considering both thinkers’ impacts on history, a question arises: whose concept of violence is more corrupting, Socrates’ or Machiavelli’sRead MoreSimilarities Between Machiavelli And Socrates1534 Words   |  7 PagesGovernment 241: Political Philosophy Professor Ives October 13, 2017 The morality which guided Socrates were an end all, be all for him. He did not wish to live without his search for truth. Socrates would see a Machiavellian Prince as self-centered, and void of morals. A Machiavellian prince would not appreciate the way Socrates carried himself and would see him as a challenge to his authority. Socrates would not support a Machiavellian society because most likely he would not be free to philosophizeRead MoreSimilarities Between Machiavelli And Socrates1250 Words   |  5 PagesMachiavelli and Socrates are two of the most influential figures in modern day political philosophy. These two individuals established the bases for our interpretation of the world and human political interaction. While they were separated by centuries and a significant geographic distance, it is fascinating nonetheless to ponder what they would think of each other. Sadly it is impossible to ask themselves and so we must instead turn to their writings in order to glean an ide a of what their opinionsRead MoreSimilarities Between Socrates And Machiavelli1649 Words   |  7 PagesSocrates and Machiavelli both existed during times of political unrest. Both men sought different means of political leadership, and could be seen as activists of their times. During times of war and unrest, it was a bold choice that both men made to stand up for their beliefs and speak out against the system. However, Socrates wouldn’t have agreed with Machiavelli’s means and concepts of the Prince and his ideas for how a political establishment should function. Machiavelli’s means may have beenRead MoreSimilarities Between Socrates And Machiavelli1803 Words   |  8 PagesMachiavelli and Socrates were beings of their time. The world around them shaped their views, and their views have in turn shaped ours. While both lived through turbulent times, they do not share the same ideology. Socrates would dislike Machiavelli’s description of the ideal prince, regardless of how the prince actually ruled. Socrates would oppose both how the prince got to power and keeps it, as well as the society over which he rules. Socrates assigned certain responsibilities to both the rulerRead MoreSimilarities Of Socrates And Machiavelli1669 Words   |  7 PagesBoth Socrates and Machiavelli emerged as renowned thinkers of their time because of their approaches to government that moved away from idealism and towards a rational and real approach. To understand why Socrates would be critical of Machiavelli’s concept of a Prince we must understand the similarities and differences between the two philosophers, and then analyze if Socrates would find his ruling system to be efficient. Socrates and Machiavelli value the qualities of a strong and fair ruler, howeverRead MoreMachiavelli And Socrates1579 Words   |  7 PagesMachiavelli and Socrates Niccolo Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during turbulent, political times. Machiavelli in Florence, Italy and Socrates in Athens. Machiavelli’s The Prince outlines the necessary features and traits of a sovereign, primarily, a Prince. It served as a handbook to effective rulership in the 16th century. By analyzing Machiavelli’s belief that a prince should be strategically feared, the role of free will , and the role of the people , I will argue that Machiavelli hasRead MoreThe Ideas Of Machiavelli And Socrates1988 Words   |  8 PagesThe ideas of Machiavelli and Socrates have influenced the leadership styles and approaches of leaders around the world. From Stalin to the founding fathers of the United States, Machiavellian influenced motives and ideals can be seen throughout modern history. Socrates is often referred to as the founder of Western philosophy, and his teachings have been passed on to leaders over the centuries. This paper will state both the Machiavel li’s concept of a ‘Prince’, and present Socrates’ perspective on

Christianity In The New World Essay Example For Students

Christianity In The New World Essay The Catholic Church during the Middle Ages played an all encompassing role over the lives of the people and the government. As the Dark Ages came to a close the ideas of the Renaissance started to take hold, and the churchs power gradually began to wain. The monarchies of Europe also began to grow replacing the churchs power. Monarchies, at the close of the Middle Ages and the dawn of the Renaissance, did not so much seek the guidance of the church as much as it sought their approval. However, the Church during the Age of Discovery was still a major influence. The discovery of the New World and its previously unknown inhabitants presented new problems in the Catholic Church in the late 14th and early 15th century. When Spains rulers and emissaries decided to physically conquer and populate the New World, and not just trade with it, the transplantation of Christian institutions followed. The church established contact with the New World, and made it a goal to establish the Catholic doctrines among the native population there. The Catholic Church and the Spanish monarch, however, looked upon the native population in the New World as souls to be saved. They did not consider or treat the Indians as equals. The implanting of Christianity in the New World, and the treatment of the native population by the missionaries and christian conquerors was detrimental to New World. Through men such as Cortez and Las Casas accounts of the conversions have been recorded. One of the reasons for this was the alliance of the Catholic Church with the Spanish monarchy. The status of the Indians was disregarded as the Christian conquers and missionaries who wanted to convert them subjected them to violence and reduced them to a laboring population. The Indians, however did not always respond in a negative way to the work of the church. The Catholic Church arrived in the New World immediately after Christopher Columbus laid claim to it for Spain. After Columbuss discovery of the new lands he wrote a series of treatise as to what the European purpose there was. Columbus, in his writings, said that the purpose of the New World was two fold. He said that the gospel message of the church should be spread globally beginning with his discoveries in the New World. Second, he stated that the riches discovered in the New World should be dedicated to the recapture of Jerusalem from the Moslems. Columbus saw the discovery of the New World as a prophesy coming true. He saw the Indians that lived there as a labor source that should be christianized and used for the greater good of the church. Two papal bulls were issued in the year of 1493 that established the Spanish position in the New World. They also established the role that the church was going to play in the New World. The first bull was issued on May 3 and it was called Inter Caetera. It said that the lands discovered by Spanish envoys not previously under a christian owner could be claimed by Spain. The bull also gave the Spanish monarch the power to send men to convert the natives to the Catholic faith and instruct them in Catholic morals. The second papal bull issued that year expanded on the meaning of the first. The bull fixed a boundary for Spanish and Portuguese spheres of influence in the New World. This boundary heavily favored Spain futher showing the alliance between Spain and the Church. The history of the Catholic Church in the New World began in the year after Columbus first voyage. The Spanish monarchy sent the first missionaries to establish Christianity there. The number of missions sent to the New World accelerated in tempo until the final decade of the 16th century. .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c , .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c .postImageUrl , .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c , .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c:hover , .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c:visited , .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c:active { border:0!important; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c:active , .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u4ec8d3aadfdc01efdebc0ec119e4986c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: A Time In History Essay The crown paid for the sending of missionaries, and its officials kept track of the many shiploads of religious personnel sent and of the expenses they incurred. The records show that the Spanish dispatched missionaries to more than 65 destinations, ranging from Florida and California to Chile and the Strait of Magellan. (Van Oss 5) Between 1493, when the first mission left

The Art of Sculpture free essay sample

Long before man could record history, people were sculpting free standing figures out of bones rocks and other objects. It is said that sculpting is the art of the people, and it is a more powerful art than literature and painting because it can be touched and felt. When a sculpture is in a gallery our attention is sustained by an intensified visual engagement. This is what makes its fixed shape come alive in the viewer’s eyes. Before the 20th century, sculpture was considered a representational art; but its scope has now been extended to include nonrepresentational forms. Sculpting has evolved over many years and it has long been accepted that the forms of functional three – dimensional objects such as furniture, pots, and buildings can also be seen as expressive and beautiful without being any way representational. The art of sculpture has changed over the years and continues to grow everyday as seen through architecture and structural design. We will write a custom essay sample on The Art of Sculpture or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Sculpting as an art form goes back to the pre historic times. Sculpting was used in rituals and community gatherings, and has made a huge impact in people’s values and beliefs. During the 4th century, most people did not know how to read or write and therefore needed visual artifacts that they could embrace. Leaders of that time turned to sculptures which were then displayed in public squares, outside schools, and basically anywhere that people could see and embrace them every day. The history of sculpting would not be complete if religion was not mentioned as a heavy influence. Sculpture is often an expression of religion and has been central in religious devotion in many cultures. Religious leaders told stories and often taught people about their beliefs through pictures and sculptures. In Catholic cathedrals sculptures are intended to testify the permanent presence of the sacred persons who support the church of God until the end of time. Without the influence of religion; it is very possible that the art of sculpting would not have had as strong of an impact as it has today. Sculpting is meant to inspire people and show significance in history through a timeless piece of greatness. It reflects a vision of what the artist is thinking and it is a form of expression where the artist turns a basic idea into reality. It starts off with an idea of some sort and then the artist gradually shows what he or she is trying to express through their sculpture. For example, sculptures of great wars and military figures that are seen in many cities around the world are used to inspire people and bring pride and patriotism to the masses in every country. There are many different types of sculptures that artists use to bring forth their ideas. There are free standing sculptures which are sculptures that you can view in a full 360 degree range. Unlike a painting or drawing, which only evokes a third dimension on a two dimensional surface, sculptures actually exist in three dimensional forms. Two other types of sculptures are sound and light sculptures. The sculpting of an object that produces sound of any sort is what this type of sculpting caters to. This type of sculpting is usually done by composers or visual artists. Light sculpting is the sculpting of any type of object or picture of light. These sculptures are done to inspire thinking and creativity through sounds and light. Jewellery is another form of sculpting. Necklaces, rings, earrings and bracelets are all made through a form of sculpting. This type of sculpting brings forth beauty which attracts consumers to buy these elegant pieces of art and wear them. There are many different variations of sculpting in regards to the materials that can be used. Sculptures can be made from stone, wood, clay, metal, wax and ivory. The process of sculpting with stone while more difficult; is the same as in wood. The stone or wood would be carved using a knife or a mallet to chisel away bits of the material until the artist has shaped the form his mind sought. Clay has been used since early times to shape and build, sometimes for practical and much needed items such as shelter, bowls, and other everyday necessities. Although it created everyday necessities, clay eventually grew as a form of art because its abundance and ease of expression. Metal sculpture can be created by a combination of many methods. Sculpture can be created by cutting metals with shears and snips, by firing and hammering metals, or by joining metals with sheet metal screws, rivets and soldering. Wax sculpture is an art form that dates back to the ancient civilizations of Egypt and Greece. History documents that wax figures were sculpted for religious ceremonies. This was also a costly endeavour and therefore the practice was reserved for royal and religious hierarchies. Finally sculpture in ivory was used by the Greeks in combination with gold for monumental works. In the Middle Ages and in modern times ivory is often used for works of small proportions and it is particularly suitable for delicate and pathetic subjects. Linking the art of Sculpture to Leadership â€Å"An artist chisels away at the stone, piece by piece until they find the figure they seek. Leadership is like a sculpture. That is, it’s a creative expression of who we are after all the stuff has been chipped away. †-Unknown Not one person was born a great leader; as history and society can prove one must develop and evolve into a leader. To become respected and excel as a leader there is a sculpting stage in one’s life which takes place. Similar to a sculpture, a leader has different attributes and materials that when placed together in harmony can become a beautiful object that will shine above others. Any material that can be shaped in three dimensions can be used to create a sculpture. With that being said; any person that has the drive to make a difference, or impact the lives of others can be a leader. Certain materials, by virtue of their structural and aesthetic properties and their availability have proved especially suitable for use. As in an artist sculpting, there are certain people who by virtue are more suitable to be a leader than others. This is because leadership can only be taught to a certain extent. Personal work ethic and ability to thrive in a leadership role is not a characteristic for everyone. Regardless of training, an individual must sculpt their own attitudes and behaviours to become an ideal role model in a leadership position. To be an excellent leader requires some elements of personality and context such as integrity and respect that cannot be taught. Throughout different periods of time, society has left us with memorable pieces of art for which people today travel great lengths to visit. These great monuments were sculpted from raw materials to endure time and last an eternity. As stated the most important materials suitable for sculpting are stone, wood, clay, ivory, and metal. These raw materials placed together became icons that demonstrate power and stability. Historically speaking stone has been the principle material of monumental sculpture. The reason for this is because many types of stone are very strong and therefore highly resistant to weather making it suitable for external use. Stone is strong and everlasting; therefore it resembles some key qualities that leaders aspire to achieve. Leaders hope to make strong, powerful imprints in the lives of others and hope that they are able to convey stories that will be remembered even after their time. The most common and easily obtainable of all materials is clay. Clay is used for modeling animal and human figures long before men discovered how to fire pots and has been one of the sculptors chief materials ever since. Sculptors use clay as a material for working out ideas; for preliminary models that are subsequently cast in such materials as plaster, metal, and concrete or carved in stone; and for pottery sculpture. With sculptors using clay to work out their ideas it proves that artists will go to great lengths to portray a vision with staggering clarity so that there is no confusion to the viewer. Leaders can do the same in their leadership by bringing focused clarity (to their followers or team) so that there is no confusion about what the task or vision is. Sculpture is a traditional form of art just like drawing, poetry, and writing. It exists all around us and is very easy to identify. When an artist sculpts they want to portray a moment; that is something that draws us in and moves us emotionally. The more successfully an artist can portray a moment to the audience, the more powerful the artist is. Like artists, leaders also want to portray a moment. They want to be able to express a moment with such clarity, interpretation and confidence that it makes a connection with their audience, and draws them in. If a leader can convey emotion, then they can increase commitment and alignment. Creativity is the way artists choose to connect with their viewers. Sculptors unleash their creativity through their art work by creating three dimensional artifacts that portray meaning and emotion. Artists can in fact push their audience to go a certain way by their creativity. For example, sculptors will intentionally position their sculpture or light their sculpture a certain way because it will serve their intentional purpose of getting the viewer where they want to go. Leaders should use the same focused intention as creative sculptors do when leading a team towards an outcome. Choosing particular lighting for the sculptor; or in leadership terms, choosing one particular path over another must be done because it will lead to something or somewhere on purpose. Michelangelo; a well respected Italian artist was one of greatest sculptors in the 15th and 16th century. Michelangelo was a great leader in the Italian Renaissance as he set standards for painting, poetry and architecture. His sculptures have changed the meaning of art forever as he was noted for his use of color, light, tone and design. Michelangelo was a great leader through his art, and was able to capture that â€Å"moment† with his viewers and be remembered long after his time. With Michelangelo’s sculptures such as Peita and David to name a few, he has been able to inspire viewers to see the beauty in art, and make that beauty a part of their lives.. Many leaders should strive to be like Michelangelo; that is to make an impact in the lives of others, make connections with viewers, and be remembered long after their time. Sculptures will last long after the artist has gone; leaders hope that the impact of their leadership will be just as lasting.

The Forgotten West

The Forgotten West ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Take-Home Midterm Essay! ! ! !Courtney Maness! ! ! !History 365Professor BrunoFebruary 20, 2014The American West has long held the imaginations and fascinations of Americans. Asksomeone what they think when they hear the term "the West", and they would likely saycowboys and Indians, ranches, the open prairie, and covered wagons. Sure these things are partof Western history and culture, but have you ever thought about it on a deeper level? Who werethe first groups of people to live in what is now America? Were Americans in the right to justmove west of the Mississippi River without any thought as to the fact that there might already bepeople settled on the land? Is the way we remember events in the history of the west correct, ordo we have a flawed or even biased view of what really happened? We never give much thoughtto these questions, we simply take the common view of events such as the battle at the Alamo,and the Indian wars, and accept that as being the final say in what happened. It is my intention topeel back the layers of three major pieces of the history of the American West, Cahokia, nowforgotten but at one time the largest city in ancient North America, and its fall from greatness;the battle at the Alamo and why it is so romanticized; and the Dakota Wars, in which Dakotatribes challenged Americans' idea of manifest destiny. How are some of these events nevermentioned in modern history lessons, while some have become larger than life?Beginning with some of the earliest days of civilization within the Mississippi Riverregion, we first arrive upon the...Monk's Mound a Pre-Columbian Mississippian culture...

Ethnic Cleansing in Sophie essays

Ethnic Cleansing in Sophie essays Sophies Choice is a story about a young writer, Stingo, who moves to New York into a boarding house. One night he hears yelling outside of his room, and when he opens his door he finds an enraged man, Nathan, screaming at a woman, Sophie, who was crying. Sophie defended Nathan when talking with Stingo. Sophie was from Poland and Nathan was Jewish. The three adults became friends and inseparable. Throughout the film, anything could set Nathan off to verbally abuse Sophie, but Stingo just could not understand why she loved Nathan if he treated her this way. Nathan and Sophie had an argument one night and the next morning packed up and left with all of their stuff. Stingo went crazy trying to look for them. While at the boarding house, Stingo got a call from Nathan, which was when Sophie walked in. Sophie told Stingo that Nathan had a gun and thought he would use it. Nathan called and threatened them and shot the gun in the phone for them to hear. Sophie and Stingo left to get away. Stingo told Sophie that he loved her, and wanted to marry her and move down south with him to southern Virginia. Sophie said she was not sure, and told him something she had never told anyone before. She said that one the day she and her two children went to Auschwitz, they were standing in line and told an officer that she and her children were Catholics from Poland and were not communist. The officer said she could choose one child since she was Polish. She chose her daughter who she was holding. That choice had been haunting her for all of those years. So when Stingo asked her to marry him and have his babies, she said she was not a fit mother for making that decision. She could never forgive herself. When Stingo woke up the next morning, Sophie left a note for him to read on her pillow. She said that she must be with Nathan for whatever that means. Stingo returned back to the boarding house to find that Nathan ...

What does it mean to be literate in this day and age Essay

What does it mean to be literate in this day and age - Essay Example To be literate is indeed a wise undertaking in the world of today and it holds more ground than it used to in the times of our forefathers. There is so much to seek, learn and understand that the man seems to go missing in the quagmire. However if he is literate he makes his own way through the zig-zag pathways and thus reaches his destination on all counts. It is a matter of fact that being literate in the current times facilitates one self in estimating what life is bringing for a person. It opens up his range of options and presents to him ideas out of the box as well. What this does is to make him do the analysis in a straight forward manner. No analysis is possible without getting to know the facts first of all. If a person is literate and understands the norms that are taking place within his life or generally, he will get to know what the strengths of the same undertakings are and how it would affect his own live as well as the ones whom he loves and takes care of. He gets to inquire the weaknesses present with the knowledge that he has obtained over a period of time and thus weighs them in light of the strong points that were previously ascertained by him in due course of time. In the world of present times, being literate means that a person is talked of in a high and esteemed manner. He is given respect by one and all since he can understand the difference between the good, the bad and the ugly. He has sense problems where the illiterates could think merry. He can make out for the troubles that lie ahead in different situations through his sheer ability of forecasting and visualization. He can look at the missing links better than an average man. He can understand his own psyche, individual basis and the manner under which he exists within the tenets of the society. He knows who he is and what is expected of him. He can create links with